hi nice site.

Guys who abuse women, spread stds, use women for sex and money, should be exposed. Cheating men, like fungi, grow in the darkness. Exposing these guys keeps them from damaging more women and children. Freedom of speech is the right of everyone and if it is true it is okay to say it. Others can choose to believe it or not but at least they have an opportunity. If you don't want bad things said about you; don't do them. Quite Simple.

Also, the man who didn't like being posted on the website was the one who filed the lawsuit. He is a lawyer. He lost his case in April 2007. The website owner has no liability and it is perfectly legal.

Hi Shari,
"Freedom of speech is the right of everyone and if it is true it is okay to say it."

True, but there is no guarantee of truth here. Have you ever been so angry at someone that you just lashed out and tried to hurt them with words? Have you ever said things that you really didn't mean or perhaps regretted having said later? I know I have. The difference being that you said it directly to that person and they were given a chance to defend themselves in private.

On a site such as DDHG, the accusation is made publicly, anonymously and in anger as the woman on Dr. Phil admitted. There really is no complete redemption for someone who has been falsely accused in public. Someone will always believe the story even if it proves to be untrue. The damage is irreversible.

I am not saying that Todd Hollis is innocent of the accusations made against him, only that if he is, the damage is unjustly done.

I do agree that the site owner is not responsible for the content of the site. Legally, she is protected, however, the users probably can be held accountable.

There is a new post:
Don't Date Him Girl! The Lawsuit…

I know the truth. I been hearing Conspiracy theories about Don'tDateHimGirl.com is a attack on straight guys by turning/converting straight girls into lesbian/Gay/Bi girls to start kissing/loving only other women and not love guys. This website seems to be nothing but a convert to bring more straight women/girls into the lesbian religion. This website creeps me out. They make out guys to be jerks but I know really nice guys out there. This website sickens me and makes it harder to marry a straight women.

>>>>" A convert to bring more straight women/girls into the lesbian religion?"

I was unaware that being a lesbian was a religion. I simply thought it was a preference of lifestyle.

Something I am not interested in…I might add. This woman has served in the Navy and Marine Corps. I have seen more bush than a sniper. I've seen it in dressing rooms, the barracks and with being a observer in a drug urinalysis. It didn't turn me on back then, so I must NOT be gay. I have always dated men. NEVER been with a woman.

I think you are just peeved that there is a website like this for women to bring these men to light. I personally really don't care about knowing if some man cheated on his girlfriend (whom he wasn't married to). I think that some girls abuse that site sometimes for unnessary bantering. BUT my best friend had her house burned down this year by her estranged husband. He tried to murder her and her three daughters. And while he was in jail, his father bailed his son out (paying $150,00), saying that he wasn't thinking too clearly when he done it and has mental problems. Now my friend fears for the lives of herself and her daughters.

I am glad this website exists, so she can tell her story to other women, because he is on the prowl, looking for young, naive girls, wanting to fill their heads full of nonsense, by saying his wife was a b_tch who deserved this. Women need to know about this baby killing loser.

I think that you men are just angry because all your gossiping about women, (calling them ho's and skanks) and ruining their reputations has just turned around and bitten you men right on the arse. I heard how you men talked about other women. In the military, you men gossiped worse than women. But then you are the first to cry about it, if women are gossiping about you.

hi all.

Definitely definitely definitely there is a need for "Don't Date Her Guy!" The girls complaining guys call them "Skanks" and "Hoes" well, "SOME" girls may just need to not act that way if they are to gain a little respect from the gorgeous men whose hearts they are playing with. Being a mother of teenage boys and seeing heaps of their awesome mates regularly, all i can say is there has got to be a better quality of girl out there for ya guys! They have your heart one week and are then drunk and with your mate the next!! Come on, lets get the guys sharing their stories too, being a female and having a beautiful teenage daughter and another one a couple of years younger I can hardly think i am being one sided here but gee I am so over the amount of books written for the girls when their behaviour can often be so much worse than the guys! The guys could do with a read, some help and support too, just keep it a small book and straight to the point to keep their interest.

Shari:

Very well and simply stated. I could not agree with you more. There is not now, or ever will be, any excuse for what is basically sociopathic behavior which harms and damages innocent people-female or male.

There may be some revenge and retaliation going on on that site, but it looks to me, for the most part, like it is providing a true service for potential future victims.

If it saves even one human being and their familial connections from undeserved heartbreak, financial or spiritual loss, or psychological or physical damage-then it is certainly a worthwhile service that is being provided.

As far as I am concerned, the noisy protesters are just afraid that there may come a day when they are exposed for what they really are…in spite of whatever facade they happen to be hiding behind. People who have nothing to hide, or lose, (at other's expense) would welcome such a service, not be protesting it.

The owner of such -witch hunt- sites defaming individuals without proof should be be made responsible for their accusations and ultimately shut down.
Period.
If not see you in East Germany or any other totalitarian System tomorrow where your own kids are turned into informers.
"People who have nothing to hide, or lose, (at other's expense) would welcome such a service, not be protesting it."-that´s exactly their argument.

I'm not entirely convinced the site's owner is legally protected from libel. Bit-torrent sites offering pirated software, music, and movies technically only contain links to trackers, hashes and checksums — nothing that's illegal. It's the users themselves who participate in the piracy. This has not stopped lawyers from the MPAA and large software vendors from successfully shutting down bit-torrent sites and getting substantial monetary judgments against the webmasters who own and operate these sites.

I'd say there's a huge precedent for burning the site's owner a new orifice, if slander/libel can be proven.

Are we supposed to believe the person who wrote the original, opening article above about don't date him dot com is a woman? Nice try, my boy, but you're not a girl. John Wayne or James Bond do a better job of convincing me they're women than you.

At any rate, humans have wined about wanting freedom of speech and no censorship for years, and then when given freedom, this is what they do, they impersonate the other gender, or they set up a situation where lies can be told about anyone with no accountability, and now, not just public figures. A new McCarthy Era is at hand, we're all targets for death by rumors like Princess Di, because we can't seem to be responsible with our freedom.

Oh, and speaking of bashing the other gender, the photos of impossible looking bimbos on this site? That bashes 98% women who don't look like that, (and will eventually bash the bimbos when they sag) because of the media's consistency in depicting these shapes and ages as the only ones ever engaged in sex.

Do your boobs make it hard for you to shave your mustache every day to fool the world into thinking you're a girl? And "good looks" are conditioned. You men (and male/female hybrids, like you) are blind obedient servants to what shape the media tells you to want to have sex with. Real men make their own choices. And their love making is like nothing on this planet (I've had the 'male bimbos,' also. Worthless).
Those luscious, incredibly masculine African men don't mind thin, medium or fat, but they think the impossible combination of thin bodies with stiff boobs the size of a fat woman feeding triplets (while pointing straight forward) is the stupidest looking body they've ever seen. Women's boobs are the size of their bodyfat unless they're nursing or are a freak mutation. I'd say 98% was being generous. And deep love and soul understanding changes how we see the other person, anyway. In fairness, the men on this page don't look like most men, either.

I sure agree with you!

Pardon my mistake above. The comment, "I sure agree with you!" was meant for "Guilty until proven innocent," who described this coming "McCarthy era" as 'witch hunts' so well. I should have scooped up that comment and put it with mine.

As for "admin" you stated it so well, also: "On a site such as DDHG, the accusation is made publicly, anonymously and in anger as the woman on Dr. Phil admitted. There really is no complete redemption for someone who has been falsely accused in public. Someone will always believe the story even if it proves to be untrue. The damage is irreversible.

But you seemed to miss the point here:

I SAID: "they impersonate the other gender, or they set up a situation where lies can be told about anyone with no accountability…" YOU SAID: "(Much as you are doing here by challenging my gender)"

That's the whole point, you've invited comments about your work yourself, your company controls the web site, you and they can remove what I say, and argue directly back, piece by piece if you want. On sites like DDHG, the men aren't inviting comments about themselves or their work as you have done here, and they have no ability to remove comments by others, nor to even argue directly back on the same site they were made as you choose to do here.

A male with hormone imbalance would certainly call this all "a bit drastic" or perhaps even, "hysterical," right? We women get that way SOOOOOO easily. Right? Couldn't possibly be foresight or insite.

It takes more than a walk and less Big Macs to change a body to the "impossible" shape. It takes restructured facial bones to close to Caucasian (a little black or a little asian is okay, but not much), changed height, changed hair, more workouts than most people who contribute to society in smarter ways have time for. and here's the most impossibe: Fat but stiff boobs with a thin body.

I was that bimbo at one time, thin, lucky enough to have the right facial structure, bleached hair, and got my boobs bigger than normal for my weight through a variety of fake means, and today, my best friend's daughter is the bimbo, and she is throwing away her brains to cause damage to her body to have fake boobs and wastes her time spending money to go to places to get worthless men to stare at her. Her sex life is not good, she's not happy, she doesn't use her very expensive college degree, she feels terrible about herself for as she states 'having no meaning in life' and therefore needs more and more "hits" of men turning their heads. What's more, a quality guy who sees past bimbos that she finally actually fell for didn't like her because "he thought she was a bimbo." She (and I at one time) were hardly using our brains to keep our bodies looking that way. The rewards are an illusion. The looks even allowed me to marry the most popular high school football hero, the greatest accomplishment a girl could hope for, to end up later with a loser. Not until I remarried the wonderful person I'm with now, and began an intelligent career which has nothing to do with appearance, did I realize what I was missing in life and how "bimbohood" drug me in the wrong direction, led me to loser men, and into a hell (Uh-oh, there goes the dramatics, the drastics, the hysterics.)

When genuine good health is a priority, most of us do "look" better on the outside. That's all we really need to aim for, but the media makes it difficult when it appears that only white (or close to Caucasian) facial features, age 20, "impossible shape" enjoys sex. The author of "Female Chauvenist Pig" shows that these bimbos have less sex than most of us. Little girls need to know that before they throw away the baseball bat or the microscope they got for Christmas, that there's another happier world than this one, and not to be sucked up into this joke if they happen to have the rare freak body most don't have, and to not try to force it if they don't.

Hey - did anyone check out the ad on this site "CheatingHouseWives.com". C'mon ladies Statistics are starting to show that it's an even split between men and women cheating on their significant other in this country. So if you decide to slander a guy on DDHG, it should only be fair, that we should be able to do the same. After all, it's all about equality, isn't it?